“The key difference between these two candidates is that one is going to do all he can to avoid a new war in the Middle East and the other one is going to hand over U.S. policy to Bibi Netanyahu and launch a new global war.” Andrew Sullivan
Fox dismisses the comments of Andrew Sullivan of course since he backs Barack Obama, but I think in this case he is half right. The US presidential election is not about picking horses, but which horseman of the apocalypse you want. Obama’s policies in the Middle East are setting up a end game confrontation between new Islamic regimes and Israel, and Romney seems keen to throw the match. Who can tell me that any of the Syrian rebels share our values?
I am for neither. While I am conservative morally, I find neither to be of the proper spirit to be president. Some say no vote equals no say, but when a proper candidate is absent voting lacks any integrity.
Regardless of who we pick or do not pick war is coming. Obama’s foreign policy fanned the flames and Romney doesn’t appear to have wisdom in the matter either. Sullivan is wrong that Obama is for peace, his peace will slay many. He is right that Romney is for war. Both men are for war, one is simply more ambiguous on which side he is on(Israel or Islam). Both want to spend money, the only difference is which rail to place it on(Defense or Obamacare). No matter who becomes president, abortion will continue.
Please tell me what voting will do?